Thursday, November 5, 2009

Geographic Skin Condition Why Is It Okay For National Geographic To Have Naked Pictures Of "primitive" People?

Why is it okay for National Geographic to have naked pictures of "primitive" people? - geographic skin condition

National Geographic has many dark images, the so-called "primitive" people in developing countries, whose natural state to be topless (or entirely nude) - both men and women.
Why is OK to print pictures also, but is not printing pictures of naked people or white people in the city?
Before saying that "because in their culture, it is naked," I say, "Well, a few white people like naked - it's called or nude sunbathing - and is part of the culture of his too"

And why has no one called National Geographic pornography?

I do not think that nudity is always pornography, but there are some people who (like John Ashcroft thought that the statue of the woman obscenity law in the Justice Department was, because his bare chest, then I have ordered that these satin .. . Douchebag!)

1 comments:

protos22... said...

"Primitive" people are naked is her way of life. Not bring your culture to a clothing company.

"White" as the act is an expression. Their culture has a clothing company, why be naked overcome?

Post a Comment